Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Network Redesign results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 451 hits. Analysis detected 2,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,950 of 16,562 topics). This Network Redesign is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Network Redesign
Topic details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos