Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Net Worth results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 2,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,360 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,974 of 15,556 topics). This Net Worth is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Net Worth
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,360
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos