Topic summary
83% 43 analyzed articles/videos 31,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 19,197 hits . Analysis detected 131,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 139,402 analyzed words across 43 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (12,851 of 15,440 topics). This Nato is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Nato
Topic details
Total words: 139,402
Article count: 43
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score43 analyzed articles139.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst