Topic summary
63% 17 analyzed articles/videos 19,348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Parks results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 5,215 hits . Analysis detected 56,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 67,557 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,759 of 16,562 topics). This National Parks is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group. National Parks
Topic details
Total words: 67,557
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles67.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst