Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Guard Deployments results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 2,019 hits. Analysis detected 16,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,714 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,536 of 16,338 topics). This National Guard Deployments is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
National Guard Deployments
Topic details
Total words: 7,714
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.2%26.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.0%15.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos