Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Bargatze results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 1,298 hits. Analysis detected 7,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,740 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,330 of 16,562 topics). This Nate Bargatze is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Nate Bargatze
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,740
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.4%27.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos