Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa’s Artemis Ii Mission results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 736 hits. Analysis detected 3,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,158 of 16,562 topics). This Nasa’s Artemis Ii Mission is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Nasa’s Artemis Ii Mission
Topic details
Total words: 5,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos