Topic summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Music Criticism results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,082 hits . Analysis detected 5,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,677 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,089 of 16,562 topics). This Music Criticism is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Music Criticism
Topic details
Total words: 4,677
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst