Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 1,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Kalder results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,082 hits . Analysis detected 5,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,677 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,256 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Kalder is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Daniel Kalder
Author details
Total words: 4,677
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.1% 23.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst