Topic summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video2,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Museum Science results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 5,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,369 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,181 of 16,503 topics). This Museum Science is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Museum Science
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,369
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos