Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Musc results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 142 faulty-reasoning hits from 999 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,702 of 22,981 topics). This Musc is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Musc
Topic details
Total words: 999
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles999 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos