Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Murders results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,080 hits . Analysis detected 7,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,684 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,537 of 16,559 topics). This Murders is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Murders
Topic details
Total words: 14,684
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst