Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rachel Sharp results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 914 hits . Analysis detected 4,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,537 authors). This Rachel Sharp is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rachel Sharp
Author details
Total words: 6,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst