Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Money results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 563 hits . Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,327 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,387 of 16,097 topics). This Money is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Money
Topic details
Total words: 3,327
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst