Topic summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mobile Home Parks results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,028 hits. Analysis detected 5,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,126 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,455 of 16,562 topics). This Mobile Home Parks is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Mobile Home Parks
Topic details
Total words: 6,126
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.8%16.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos