Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mixed Martial Arts results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 732 hits. Analysis detected 6,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,824 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (13,506 of 15,769 topics). This Mixed Martial Arts is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Mixed Martial Arts
Topic details
Total words: 9,824
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos