Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GREG BEACHAM results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 3,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,531 of 6,629 authors). This GREG BEACHAM is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. GREG BEACHAM
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.8% 6.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst