Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Legislation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 2,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,021 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (15,115 of 16,558 topics). This Missouri Legislation is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Missouri Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 7,021
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos