Topic summary
41% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missiles results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,192 hits . Analysis detected 5,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,821 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,634 of 15,832 topics). This Missiles is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Missiles
Topic details
Total words: 6,821
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst