Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 1,007 hits. Analysis detected 4,390 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,511 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,642 of 16,562 topics). This Minneapolis is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Minneapolis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,511
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos