Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Aloi results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 1,472 hits . Analysis detected 6,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,753 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (802 of 6,628 authors). This Jacob Aloi is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Jacob Aloi
Author details
Total words: 3,753
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.9% percentile 6.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 39.2% 39.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 24.5% 24.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 19.1% 19.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 39.2%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 24.5%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst