Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Threats results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 1,333 hits . Analysis detected 7,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,293 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (5,101 of 16,562 topics). This Military Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Military Threats
Topic details
Total words: 5,293
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 25.2% 25.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst