Topic summary
75% 33 analyzed articles/videos 13,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Operations results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 11,306 hits . Analysis detected 100,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 104,791 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (13,093 of 15,689 topics). This Military Operations is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Military Operations
Topic details
Total words: 104,791
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score33 analyzed articles104.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst