Topic summary
⁠68%4 analyzed articles/videos3,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Leadership results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,435 hits. Analysis detected 14,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,014 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,329 of 15,788 topics). This Military Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Military Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 15,014
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos