Topic summary
⁠81%3 analyzed articles/videos3,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Intervention results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,140 hits. Analysis detected 11,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,745 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,670 of 16,212 topics). This Military Intervention is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Military Intervention
Topic details
Total words: 11,745
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos