Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Drills results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,795 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,155 of 16,562 topics). This Military Drills is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Military Drills
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,795
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.4%21.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos