Taiwan to slow mobile internet in civil defense drills as China threat grows 65%

By Yimou Lee87%

7/21/2026, 12:56:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 745 faulty-reasoning hits from 429 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,208 of 20,518 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the article peer group.

TAIPEI - Taiwan will deliberately slow mobile internet speeds for the first time ⁠during annual civil defense drills in August, testing how citizens would communicate if bandwidth became scarce in emergencies ranging from disasters to a Chinese invasion. 
During the 30-minute slowdown, high-bandwidth services, such as video calls, streaming and social media images, will be unavailable across 14 cities and ​counties in northern and central Taiwan home to about 70% of the ‌population, government planning ‌documents show. 
The exercise is part of Taiwan’s push to ​beef up preparedness as China steps up military pressure around the island, prompting officials to plan not only for air raids but also communications disruptions in case of a ⁠blockade, cyberattack or invasion. 
“We hope the current drills will not only involve central government agencies, but ​also help the public strengthen their own preparations for using different communication methods,” a senior Taiwan security official told a briefing. 
The official, speaking on ​condition of anonymity, pointed to a ⁠recent spike in Chinese coast guard activities off Taiwan’s Pacific coast. 
It was a “global trend” for governments to run disrupted communications ⁠drills, the official added, ​citing examples from Japan and Singapore. 
Communications resilience has become ​a growing strategic concern for Taipei after repeated undersea cable breaks in recent ​years exposed ‌its vulnerability to disruptions that officials say could stem from natural disasters, sabotage or China’s grey-zone tactics. 
Taiwanese authorities have also been holding drills to prepare officials and the public for “compound disasters”  cascading crises that could range from earthquakes to ‌war with China. 
China claims democratically governed Taiwan as its own and has not ruled out using force to take control of the island. 
Taiwan strongly rejects China’s sovereignty claim, saying only its people can decide their future. 
The slowdown during Taiwan’s annual air-raid drills will affect the ​central ​region on Aug. 10 and its north on Aug. 13 for ​30 minutes each time. 
Key services, from ATMs and traffic signals to emergency ambulance ⁠calls, will not be affected. 
“We hope the public will think ahead about possible backup options, and consider what impact or changes there may be during those 30 minutes,” said a second senior security official, who also sought anonymity. 
Such ​options could include landlines, fixed-line internet or even walkie-talkies, the official said, adding people should agree in advance on ways to contact family members and sites to meet them. 
A publicity campaign, including television ticker messages, will spread guidance on how citizens should respond, the official added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Yimou Lee: 14.7%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic20.3%This article: 4.9%Yimou Lee: 1.6%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Yimou Lee: 3.0%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias9.1%This article: 16.8%Yimou Lee: 10.8%The Japan Times: 14.4%Framing Effect16.8%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.3%Yimou Lee: 6.4%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias19.3%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 27.7%Yimou Lee: 11.3%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias27.7%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Yimou Lee: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Yimou Lee: 8.9%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.9%Yimou Lee: 8.5%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority15.9%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.9%Yimou Lee: 3.3%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization4.9%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.9%Yimou Lee: 4.9%The Japan Times: 0.7%Bandwagon4.9%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.4%Yimou Lee: 2.8%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.4%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.7%Yimou Lee: 6.9%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote20.7%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 1.0%The Japan Times: 9.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.2%Yimou Lee: 14.1%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination4.2%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Yimou Lee: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

429 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.