Topic summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Defense results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,513 of 15,447 topics). This Civil Defense is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Civil Defense
Topic details
Total words: 1,287
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst