Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Defense results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 4,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,964 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,508 of 16,562 topics). This Military Defense is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Military Defense
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,964
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.2%15.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.6%10.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos