Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mikie Sherrill results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 100 hits . Analysis detected 600 faulty-reasoning hits from 726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Mikie Sherrill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mikie Sherrill
Topic details
Total words: 726
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles726 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst