Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mideast Wars results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 2,952 hits. Analysis detected 16,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,392 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (10,082 of 16,562 topics). This Mideast Wars is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Mideast Wars

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate