Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microsoft Surface results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 1,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,359 of 16,562 topics). This Microsoft Surface is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Microsoft Surface
Topic details
Total words: 2,692
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.2%18.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos