Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microsoft Insider Program results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 2,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,014 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,359 of 16,562 topics). This Microsoft Insider Program is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Microsoft Insider Program
Topic details
Total words: 4,014
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos