Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Jackson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,800 of 16,562 topics). This Michael Jackson is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Michael Jackson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.9%27.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 22.1%22.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos