Fan Climbed a Crane During Michael Jackson’s 1996 Seoul Concert  MJ Held Him to His Chest and Finished Earth Song Anyway 63%

By Sohini41%

5/30/2026, 11:06:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 47.8% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,930 of 21,198 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the article peer group.

In 1996, Michael Jackson was performing the HIStory World Tour in Seoul, South Korea. 
He was practically suspended in the air with the help of a crane, and the crowd was looking up at him. 
But of course, one very dedicated fan from the crowd actually managed to reach Jackson on top. 
While many stars may have panicked or paused the concert, MJ held the fan tightly to his chest to make sure that he was safe. 
He finished the remainder of "Earth Song" with the fan held to his chest as wind machines blasted from below. 
The resurfaced video has drawn significant reaction from viewers who praised both Jackson's stage presence and his instinct to secure the fan rather than halt the performance 
The video ends with the crane being safely lowered toward the ground, and the fan was escorted off of MJ soon after. 
The fan could be heard repeatedly shouting "I love you" as the crane descended. 
Some fans on Reddit took the opportunity to reference Michael Jackson's most popular songs in their comments while also praising his stage presence. 
One wrote, “Michael is like ‘I can't let this fan fall and die.’” 
Another user said, “Say say say what you want, but don’t tell me Michael was not an incredible performer.” 
A third comment read, “Now, I don't wanna be starting something, but that performance was a genuine thriller!” 
Another commenter wrote, “They float together and the dude is just taking in the moment, raising his hands to the heavens, overlooking the crowd as Michael belts it behind him in this majestic moment that will probably be the highlight of his entire life.” 
The commenter also pointed out the fact that the fan literally came “crashing down to reality” and eventually got beaten up. 
“Main character syndrome much?” 
wrote another person. 
While yet another thought, “The dude is definitely selfish. 
But ultimately I think this is such an iconic moment and I'm happy it happened the way it did.” 
A true-blue MJ fan wrapped up with: “Always impressive to see a professional. 
He didn’t even flinch, but first [ensured] he [could] hold onto the guy to prevent him from falling, all while continuing his performance.” 
One would have to agree on this point, right? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.3%Sohini: 3.5%dailydot.com: 4.3%Confirmation Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.3%dailydot.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Sohini: 3.4%dailydot.com: 4.2%Availability Heuristic17.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.5%dailydot.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias5.0%This article: 16.8%Sohini: 1.0%dailydot.com: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias16.8%This article: 11.8%Sohini: 4.8%dailydot.com: 4.9%Framing Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.0%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.5%Sohini: 1.1%dailydot.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Sohini: 6.5%dailydot.com: 8.7%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.1%dailydot.com: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Sohini: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error15.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Sohini: 1.8%dailydot.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 43.3%Sohini: 3.5%dailydot.com: 2.4%Halo Effect43.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Sohini: 2.4%dailydot.com: 2.0%Ad Hominem3.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%Sohini: 2.6%dailydot.com: 1.8%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 6.3%Sohini: 1.9%dailydot.com: 2.3%False Dilemma6.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.3%Sohini: 6.8%dailydot.com: 8.9%Hasty Generalization16.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 14.8%Sohini: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.4%Bandwagon14.8%This article: 41.0%Sohini: 5.9%dailydot.com: 7.1%Appeal to Emotion41.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.3%Sohini: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.5%dailydot.com: 1.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.8%Sohini: 7.7%dailydot.com: 7.3%Anecdotal8.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Middle Ground4.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 47.8%Sohini: 4.0%dailydot.com: 4.9%Unattributed Quote47.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 4.2%dailydot.com: 3.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 47.5%Sohini: 3.7%dailydot.com: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice47.5%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.1%dailydot.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.7%dailydot.com: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

400 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.