Keyword summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seoul results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 446 hits . Analysis detected 3,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,133 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,137 of 36,716 keywords). This Seoul is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Seoul
Keyword details
Total words: 3,133
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst