Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These #metoo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,069 of 16,562 topics). This #metoo is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
#metoo
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,327
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos