Topic summary
⁠8%2 analyzed articles/videos889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meteorologists results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 2,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,418 of 16,559 topics). This Meteorologists is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Meteorologists
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos