Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mesa Verde National Park results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,019 hits. Analysis detected 7,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,451 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,331 of 16,562 topics). This Mesa Verde National Park is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Mesa Verde National Park
Topic details
Total words: 5,451
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.7%18.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos