Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Tassy results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,087 hits . Analysis detected 7,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,250 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,550 of 6,628 authors). This Elaine Tassy is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Elaine Tassy
Author details
Total words: 8,250
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst