Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men's World Hockey Championship results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 621 hits. Analysis detected 3,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,963 of 16,562 topics). This Men's World Hockey Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Men's World Hockey Championship
Topic details
Total words: 4,316
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos