Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karel Janicek results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 454 hits . Analysis detected 2,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,167 of 6,628 authors). This Karel Janicek is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Karel Janicek
Author details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.9% 16.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst