Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos1,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Men's Health results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 7,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,023 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (12,298 of 15,361 topics). This Men's Health is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Men's Health
Topic details
Total words: 10,023
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos