Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Markle results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 2,760 hits . Analysis detected 21,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,364 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,472 of 16,503 topics). This Meghan Markle is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Meghan Markle
Topic details
Total words: 24,364
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst