Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Case Study results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,491 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (13,572 of 15,769 topics). This Medical Case Study is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Medical Case Study
Topic details
Total words: 4,491
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos