Topic summary
⁠85%3 analyzed articles/videos1,563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid Funding results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,047 hits. Analysis detected 9,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,636 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,008 of 16,558 topics). This Medicaid Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Medicaid Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,636
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos