Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harold Brubaker results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 347 hits . Analysis detected 1,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,079 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,113 of 6,371 authors). This Harold Brubaker is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Harold Brubaker
Author details
Total words: 2,079
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst