Topic summary
95% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid Cuts results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,889 hits . Analysis detected 14,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,690 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,121 of 16,482 topics). This Medicaid Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Medicaid Cuts
Topic details
Total words: 8,690
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 21.7% 21.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst