Topic summary
95%3 analyzed articles/videos1,929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid Cuts results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,889 hits. Analysis detected 14,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,690 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,121 of 16,482 topics). This Medicaid Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Medicaid Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,690
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 21.7%21.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.3%16.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate