Topic summary
55% 11 analyzed articles/videos 730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayoral Election results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 3,301 hits . Analysis detected 33,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,849 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,515 of 16,562 topics). This Mayoral Election is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Mayoral Election
Topic details
Total words: 34,849
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles34.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst