Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Mamdani results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 5,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,016 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (12,719 of 15,765 topics). This Mayor Mamdani is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Mayor Mamdani
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,016
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos